Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 33,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 10:39 am
Curiel scheduled the Apple v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:10 am
This is what happened in Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Lucia now argues that the SEC’s compliance with this decision removes only part of the constitutional infirmity surrounding the agency’s ALJs because they still enjoy too many layers of tenure protection (Lucia v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:58 pm
That focus explicitly tied anti-corruption efforts to a commitment to deepen rule of law structures in Mexico, not just for those who could afford it, but to all Mexicans. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court was Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 1:03 pm
In Harborside Health Center v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Additional Resources: Crispin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
It's in stark contrast to what the firm's founder, John Quinn, told Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California at a 2014 Apple v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
As the Maine law explains, under a Ranked-Choice voting regime (a version of which has been used in some local jurisdictions, such as San Francisco County, for years), “the method of casting and tabulating votes [is one] in which voters rank candidates in order of preference, [and then] tabulation proceeds in sequential rounds in which last-place candidates are defeated and the candidate with the most votes in the final round is elected. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:50 am
It therefore refused to certify the class under California law. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
The provision of the DTSA following this one ensures that the law shall not be used as a mechanism to get around state law of those states that have rejected the inevitable disclosure doctrine, namely, California, Louisiana, Maryland and Virginia. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:33 am
The memo rests on a decision by the California Supreme Court in California Cannabis Coalition v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:52 am
In April, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:10 am
In People ex rel Becerra v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:07 pm
So we have once again filed a friend of the court brief opposing that effort.The case, IMDB v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:12 pm
Inventing a new predominance requirement not found anywhere in Rule 23, the Hyundai majority held that a district court may certify a nationwide class alleging violations of California law only after “apply[ing] the California governmental interest test. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Wall-Street.Com LLC (Jan. 8): Requirements for making “registration of [a] copyright claim” Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
