Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8781 - 8800 of 16,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2014, 6:23 am by Judy Selby
  Moreover, to the extent [Polanco] alleges that the injury she suffered here is the “loss” (or presumably, disclosure) of her information in violation of HIPAA and Defendants’ failure to secure her information going forward as required by HIPAA, the Court notes that HIPAA does not provide a private right of action to remedy HIPAA violations. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:05 pm by JP Sarmiento
Basic research is also research that advances scientific knowledge, but does not have specific immediate commercial objectives although it may be in fields of present or potential commercial interest. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
However, a suit alleging interception does not preclude an additional lawsuit asserting different causes of action. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by K.O. Herston
Conducting a best interests analysis is broad and subjective and does not include hard and fast rules. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:57 am by Ann Caresani
Supreme Court reiterated the distinction between plan amendments made by plan sponsors, and summary plan descriptions prepared by plan administrators, even when the same entity fills both roles, and held that an SPD does not amend a plan. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:37 am
Glennon, The Road Ahead; Gaps, Drips, and Cyber-Conflict Noam Lubell, Lawful Targets in Cyber Operations: Does the Principle of Distinction Apply? [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Question #9 – H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa My H-1B is going to expire on October 1? [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
After all, a piece is missing from the White House’s announced no-negotiations strategy: What will the President do if the other side does not blink? [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:18 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Complaints started streaming in, especially from taxpayers who filed using H&R Block. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court, however, is required to consider the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 76-f (2) (a)-(h) and allow the parties to submit information regarding these factors before determining that New York is an inconvenient forum. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  By certifying, Notre Dame would not "authorize" anything:  Federal law does that work. [read post]