Search for: "Million v State"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 24,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Last week, a Texas state court issued a whopping judgment in favor of a former employee of FE Services LLC. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Those disclosure failures meant that the minority stockholders were not adequately informed, and that the transaction was not eligible for the safe harbor of the MFW framework (City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:49 am
Paper v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 8:47 pm
Patent No. 7,523,373 on a "minimum memory operating voltage technique" and $675 million for U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:44 pm
Millions Of Automobiles Covered According to class action court papers there are over millions of Toyota brand automobiles covered by the settlement, including Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles sold in the United States between 1998 to 2010. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
In CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Under Delaware law, the Court of Chancery wrote, a forced resignation is a termination, and the shareholder fell short of pleading gross negligence or bad faith in connection with the demand refusal (Andersen v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:17 am
At issue is whether the landmark Supreme Court opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am
And I was pissed to learn the company that cut the staff just gave executives $1.2 million in bonuses. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Paul Croatian Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:56 am
Milton Dadeland, LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:06 am
In DKN Holdings LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 3:12 am
Marathon Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 4:27 pm
Lord Abbett Municipal Income Fund Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:35 am
Danicek suffered brain injuries and was awarded a $5.9-million settlement.In a Mary Carter agreement, Poole paid Danicek just over $1 million. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
The DOMA (Section 3) case before the high court was United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:43 pm
It remains, however, that EU Member States could still prohibit, under their national laws, the use of signs which are in dubious taste, either if registration for such signs is denied or granted at European level. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
CASE OF SCOPPOLA v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:19 am
In Gordon v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:28 am
The opinion, United States v. [read post]
