Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 13,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2014, 6:20 am
On the Court we have decisions such as the District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
In short, on January 9, 2014, Governor Chris Christie staked his political future on his claim that he had no knowledge, involvement, nor direct liability for the mean-spirited abuses of government power that were employed to impose traffic havoc on the people of Fort Lee, New Jersey. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:13 am
Herndon (1927), Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
While Canadian judges, like their Commonwealth siblings, are unwilling to adopt a New York Times v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:22 am
North Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:20 pm
Bush v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
There are plenty of political hurdles there too. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
We wanted to open up the political process, and let all of the people come in, and it didn't matter whether they were black or white, Latino, Asian-American or Native American." [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:58 am
Justice Harris' viciously proslavery opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 5:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
” Somehow the Divisional Court manages to find that the policy “in a general sense” strikes a fair balance between the in/out of work – “a broad political concept of fairness”, as the court puts it, perhaps with a sneer at the unfairness of it.It will be interesting to see what the Court of Appeal makes of it. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
” Somehow the Divisional Court manages to find that the policy “in a general sense” strikes a fair balance between the in/out of work – “a broad political concept of fairness”, as the court puts it, perhaps with a sneer at the unfairness of it.It will be interesting to see what the Court of Appeal makes of it. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
The decision stands at odds from a ruling from a federal judge in Washington D.C.The case is A.C.L.U. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
ACLU v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:20 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
