Search for: "STATE v. YOUNGS"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 8,903
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 1:35 pm
The Court devotes two thirds of its opinion to addressing Young's legal insufficiency claim, and to revisiting the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
In Marek v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
He had sustained significant injury to his skull and brain and at the time of the trial was in a vegetative state, requiring 24-hour care with little hope of recovery.4. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
United States U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:33 pm
United States, No. 06-10993 (D. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
No, young Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 pm
The KSC dismissed as improvidently granted a state's petition for review preserving Mark Schoenhofer's win in State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Young, Judge) is a bankruptcy appeal and deals with the signatures on the mortgage. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 11:29 am
The New York Law Journal reports this morning (March 15) that NY State Supreme Court Justice Bernard Fried has ordered that some lawyers who were present at the "secret" settlement meeting on January 31 submit to depositions to settle a hotly disputed point: whether a Sullivan & Cromwell partner who was present at the meeting, Gandolfo V. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
JOHNSON, KLEIN, KRUGER, LANZA, LARKIN, LAVALLE, LEIBELL, LIBOUS, LITTLE, MALTESE, MARCELLINO, MAZIARZ, NOZZOLIO, ONORATO, OPPENHEIMER, PADAVAN, RATH, ROBACH, SALAND, SAMPSON, SAVINO, SEWARD, SKELOS, SMITH, STACHOWSKI, STAVISKY, STEWART-COUSINS, TRUNZO, VALESKY, WINNER, WRIGHT, YOUNG Amd Ment Hyg L, generally; add S837-r, amd SS508, 259-a, 259-i & 259-j, Exec L; amd SS168-a, 5, 402, 404 & 500-a, add S622, Cor L; amd SS390.50, 380.50, 190.71, 720.35, 725.15, 200.50 & 1.20,… [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
Young, JudgeRepresenting Appellants (Plaintiffs): Karen Budd-Falen and Brandon L. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
Examining legislative intent, the Court noted that the predecessor statute from which §11-604(b) was derived also focused exclusively on restitution as applied to child defendants or respondents and their parents, and a subsequent revision further verified that the General Assembly did not intend to include adult defendants within the purview of the limit on restitution orders.The Court further noted that its interpretation of the statute was consistent with the rehabilitative purpose of… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:11 pm
One other circuit, the Fifth, has likewise held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right, but in that case, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Cohen praised the new Democratic senators and congressmen generally as a strong group of young legislators. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:56 am
" Mich. top judges go wild [Detroit News] Feuding justices spar as they work [Detroit Free Press] People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Located On: Ford & Harrison LLP Most Popular State Law Article California Management Update (pdf). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Ayotte v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
Curtis V. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:04 am
[7] Pittsnogle v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:21 am
Young, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Cross-Petitioners/Respondents): David B. [read post]
