Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8781 - 8800 of 13,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 8:45 am by Richard Hasen
The 2006 Amendments to the Voting Rights Act passed the United States Senate by a vote of 98-0 and passed the House 390-33, but there was more intrigue than the lopsided numbers suggest. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:19 am by Eugene Volokh
[T]he new couple traveled to the United States, following the execution of necessary visas and other related paperwork so that [the wife] could reside here. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 11:00 pm by Daniel Joshua Salinas
The Art of Living Foundation (“AOLF”) is the United States branch of the international Art of Living Foundation based in Bangalore, India, and is a California corporation. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Michael Rosman
  (On the other hand, the Court also said that, as part of its narrow-tailoring obligation, colleges and universities “can and should draw on the most promising aspects of . . . race-neutral alternatives [in states like California, Florida, and Washington where the consideration of race was prohibited by state law] as they develop. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:29 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- in which California is located -- acknowledged a First Amendment right to film matters of public interest, including the activities of police officers, over seventeen years earlier in Fordyce v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:51 pm by GiovannaShay
" Nonetheless, Judge Wolf writes, "the Eighth Amendment promises prisoners such care,"  citing the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in the California over-crowding case, Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:38 am by Florian Mueller
Department of Justice (DOJ), who stressed Samsung's importance and said he "hope[s] Samsung Electronics can sell its products in the United States despite the [recent California jury] verdict".The governments of the United States and South Korea are traditional close allies. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
 In my view, federal courts are unduly sensitive to claims of prior restraint while states like California and Ohio have been more inclined to balance the various interests in these disputes. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am by Cormac Early
In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus discusses the possibility of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
He registered the red lacquered outsole as a trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 2008. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:14 am by Stacia A. Wells
Donnelly & Sons, Co., Case Number CV12-7331-SVW, United States District Court, Central District of California. [read post]