Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 8781 - 8800 of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It passed a bill saying that “all terms of sentence” included the discharge of financial obligations such as fines, fees and restitution.Sunday’s court decision enjoined the application of that law.Like many American states, during most of its history Florida took away permanently the voting rights of persons convicted of serious crimes.Article VI, Section 13 of its first state constitution said that: “laws shall be made by the General Assembly, to… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Nigeria On 14 June 2023, Nigeria Data Protection Bill was signed into law. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Other states, however, have answered the question in the affirmative. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Stating that a breach is incapable of remedy in a s146 notice risks a court later finding that the breach was capable of remedy and therefore that the notice was invalid. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
Stating that a breach is incapable of remedy in a s146 notice risks a court later finding that the breach was capable of remedy and therefore that the notice was invalid. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:28 am by MBettman
Clinic Lacked Standing to Challenge Budget Bill’s Constitutionality Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:11 am by Daniel Schwartz
But unfortunately, we seem to be no closer to passage of a bill than we were a decade ago. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:37 am by Carmel Shachar
Very often, the discussion is centered about the impact that Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  In many ways, the bill would have subjected ridesharing drivers to some of the same regulations and expectations the state already imposes upon professional taxi services.[16]             When all of these provisions presumably would have been in the interest of the safety of the people of the state, and professional taxi companies are subject to even stricter state regulation, why did… [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am by Kevin Kaufman
First, plaintiffs argue that the provision fails the ambiguity test under Pennhurst State Sch. v. [read post]