Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 19,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
Out on the west, Alicante hosts the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, which administers Community trade marks and designs, while London, Paris and Milan are generally hives of IP activity, speculation and intrigue. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 1:31 pm
VI; United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
The AMO holder was not a counterfeit incorporating any of PMI’s trade marks and PMI has not asserted patent protection at this stage. 3D trade marks protecting the shape of products can be difficult to register. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:59 am
Seemingly, as was the case in the recent US Supreme Court judgment in Kimble v Marvel [Katposts here and here], this emerges through cases involving superheroes, and a recent Ninth Circuit decision involving Batman was no exception.The case of DC Comics v Mark Towle 2:11-cv-03934-RSWL-OP (accessible here) dealt with the copyright protection of the Batmobile, ever-present in the Batman saga, and its infringement through the making of replicas of specific versions… [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
The majority expressed some doubt about whether that tire chalking is actually a search under the physical trespass theory of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am
Citing to UMG v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
The Republic of Kazakhstan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:57 am
DYFS v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 2:39 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:51 am
USPTO v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:29 am
The Ninth Circuit made clear that the cancellation claim could not go forward, at least in federal district court: “The plain language of Section 37 states that cancellation is available in ‘any action involving a registered mark. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 1:29 pm
It is a Supreme Court case from 1992, Lee v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:42 pm
EPW has an article on the ongoing forest case (T.N.Godavarman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 3:16 pm
Dupree v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:18 pm
In a recently published decision in S.C. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:21 pm
In Borrome v. [read post]
