Search for: "State v. Still" Results 8781 - 8800 of 44,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2016, 3:18 am
In a decision in April of this year in Globe Motors v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Limited the Court of Appeal decided that no matter what the written terms of the contract state, the parties have freedom of contract to agree what they want. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Post, The Courts on Climate Change and Fundamental Rights Arnon Gutfeld, Cantwell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     In 1945, the Supreme Court blessed a lesser known type of agency deference in Bowles v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit has been plaintiff-friendly in this area, but some cases are still chucked aside for lack of evidence.The case is Solomon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:06 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that employees who were not entitled to certain overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act can still get that overtime under the New York Labor Law.The case is Hayward v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Baton Rouge (LA) Advocate reported yesterday on the Louisiana Supreme Court's per curiam opinion and a concurrence in Parents of Minor Child v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:44 am by Howard Friedman
As previously reported, last week the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in State of Hawaii v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 3:18 am
In a decision in April of this year in Globe Motors v TRW Lucas Varity Electric Steering Limited the Court of Appeal decided that no matter what the written terms of the contract state, the parties have freedom of contract to agree what they want. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
It is only after that process is completed that equitable relief may be pursued.Since W.K. first needed to exhaust all “administrative remedies” with the PHHPC, (as outlined in the state’s Public Health Law), before seeking an injunction, the AD2 thought the order compelling his admittance was issued prematurely and was thus rescinded.This couldn't be what the doctor ordered ….# # #DECISIONW.K. v New York Presbyt. [read post]