Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2007, 1:29 pm
Supposing if a State is predominantly illiterate, and socially backward, would not the proportionality element result in pruning of the list of OBCs in that state to unacceptable and even unconvincing level? [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
The petitioner, Thomas Cress, is a Michigan state prisoner serving a life sentence for first-degree felony murder. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
§ 2554, that requires the United States military to assist the Boy Scouts organization with its Jamboree, a big to-do held every four years. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 8:26 am
The United States' petition on the same set of rules asserted different grounds and could be successful. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
United States, upholding the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:38 pm
This will impact the United States' place in the global economy. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:09 am
In the United States, for example, a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the plaintiff is (or will be) harmed by the law. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
The United States Supreme Court has issued an order directing supplemental briefing in the pending case of Panetti v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
Reference to title 35, United States Code.Sec. 3. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
United States, 180 F.3d 349, 354 (1st Cir. 1999) (one year grace period in for petitions after effective date of AEDPA) applies because Congress's control over immigration proceedings is "plenary. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:03 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Kannon Shanmugam will argue for the United States as an amicus in support of Tellabs. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:40 am
Clement, who will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:36 am
United States, 125 S. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
United States, Respondent. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
United States U.S. [read post]
