Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 8781 - 8800
of 60,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
The recent case of McMaster v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 9:50 am
Wells Fargo v. [read post]
Sorry, but your political enemies can use your copyrighted works (as long as their use is fair use).
9 Dec 2008, 9:37 am
” Defendants’ use of “Imagine” is similar to the use at issue in a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in which fair use was found, Blanch v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:18 pm
This imbalance was noticed by the Supreme Court in cases like State of West Bengal v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
After House was terminated, she claims Iacovelli urged her to mislead the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services by stating that she was terminated for “lack of work” to qualify for unemployment benefits. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:02 pm
Additional Resources: Ward v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:54 pm
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a request for discretionary review in People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:11 pm
There was no evidence of impairment at work, and the employee had a very good work record. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am
In my view, it has worked not one, but two, major changes to the landscape of American employment. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
The question in that case was whether the creator of an expressive work, a work that enjoys First Amendment protection, could be liable under the Lanham Act and state right of publicity laws for using a celebrity’s name in the title of that expressive work. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:51 am
In Burdette v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:29 am
In footnote 1 of its Reply, IBM states that it has developed a memory device that would enable an iPod to store 500,000 songs, all while being cheaper to produce. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:59 am
The contract is signed, the work begins, and the relationship sours. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
In Seymore v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
One especially memorable case was Finkel v. [read post]
