Search for: "DOES 2-25" Results 8801 - 8820 of 16,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 3:24 am
What if Del Taco opposes on the ground of Section 2(a) false association? [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:02 pm by Liz Bradshaw
Looking at the big picture, it’s estimated that 20 million Americans get norovirus each year, at a cost of $2 billion. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm by Bill Otis
Any account of sentencing that does not acknowledge this fact is incorrect.2. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:46 am by Denis Stearns
Shiga died at the age of 85 years on 25 January 1957. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:58 pm by James
Edgar, WI — Three people were hospitalized following a three-vehicle accident in Edgar, Wisconsin, on Thursday, April 2, 2015. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FCPA Professor blog has a detailed review of the issues addressed in Judge Hickey’s ruling in an interesting April 2, 2015 post, here. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
We’re covered by federal law, but just barely (25 employees). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Mr Tomlinson pointed out that, whilst it has brought comfort to some, the ‘Costeja procedure’, i.e. the reporting of individual URLs after they have appeared on Google, does little to address systematic problems, for example, such as where a determined poster repeatedly puts large amounts of the same personal data onto Facebook or Google Groups, a problem faced by recent claimant recently when an unidentified person repeatedly made thousands of online postings to the effect… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
The hearing begins in Region 2 (Manhattan) to address allegations in the complaints of Region 2 and Region 4, and then will move to Region 13 (Chicago) to address allegations in the complaints of Region 13 and Region 25. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Announced by the DOL on February 23, 2015, the final rule at issue was published in the Federal Register on February 25 (80 FR 9989-10001). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
Secondly the Court held [at 25] that:"in order to be classified as an act of 'making available to the public' within Article 3(2) of that directive that, in order to be classified as an act of ‘making available to the public’ within the meaning of that article, an act must meet, cumulatively, both conditions set out in that provision, namely that members of the public may access the protected work from a place and at a time individually chosen by… [read post]