Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 4:48 am
The capital client, by the way, eventually worked out a deal and is now serving a sentence from which he will first be eligible for parole in about another 145 years. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
After explaining the general principles of FRAND the Judge in Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) calculated what the FRAND rates should be for Lenovo. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:00 am
Cosey v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:22 pm
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Tortorice et ux. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
Ct.)), New York (Curbow, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
TRUSTe, Kruska v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Because a deal's a deal. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 12:24 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Hospadales v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Starbucks and Doe 1 v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
Bigelow v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:53 am
(Randy Barnett) In Marbury v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
It did not deal with some of the more acerbic arguments of the Claimants concerning, inter alia, the non-primacy of EU law (Up, para. 219). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 7:52 am
Odom v. [read post]
7 practical tips on digital evidence for lawyers. Protection, preservation, tracking, and privilege.
10 Jul 2017, 7:13 pm
As we indicated in a previous article, the Supreme Court of Canada held in R. v. [read post]