Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 16,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:06 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged before about United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:07 pm
(I previewed Kansas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:34 pm
Thus, the district court bemoaned the fact that the current state of the law “would seem to require that this Court hold for defendants. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
In Brucia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
Aydell v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
We did so sincerely hoping we could come to a peaceful settlement with you. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:06 am
In Marek v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:56 pm
There are also some Nokia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:02 pm
I hope this will be considered by the European Commission, which at least appears to be somewhat unconvinced of Samsung's SEP-related antitrust settlement proposal.On another Apple-Samsung note, Judge Koh's court in San Jose, California, stated on Wednesday that Apple's motion for a recovery of attorneys' fees and other costs, which Apple noted for a January 20, 2014 hearing, will be heard on May 1, 2014 instead. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 11:52 am
With these privacy concerns in mind, last week we filed an amicus brief in the Connecticut Appellate Court in State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
All of which I want to put aside for now.Rather, what struck me is how there probably isn't, in fact, as nearly an effective cultural constraint against state-sponsored Brady violations as we'd hope (or expect) there to be. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:01 am
Kelley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:16 pm
It leaves no doubt about the current state of the law. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
Seuss Enterprises, LP v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Hope to see you at the hearing! [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
But honesty requires acknowledging that a big part of the motivation behind a compensation scheme is surely the hope that it will induce some to provide PBSCs who otherwise would not have done so. [read post]
