Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 58,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2013, 7:45 am
In the putative class action, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 11:00 pm
Additionally, a court must find that reunification "with one or both of the juvenile's parents is not viable due to parental abuse, neglect, abandonment, or a similar basis found under state law … and that it would not be in the juvenile's best interests to be returned to his or her native country or country of last habitual residence. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:35 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees and the state procedures remain on the books.The case is Goe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:44 am
On the heels of the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
The case, from the Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, is State v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
B.L.: In this free speech case, the school district punished a high school student for her limited-distribution Snapchat post stating “Fuck school fuck softball fuck cheer fuck everything. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:44 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
”The judge relied in part on Frazier v. [read post]
21 May 2025, 6:03 am
At least one judge has pledged to do the same in her courtroom. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:48 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Silva v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
Here is the opinion in In re Michael V. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 11:38 am
State, out of Tippecanoe County, and Travis Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
But Butts could face more time if convicted under the state's habitual offender law because she has prior theft convictions. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
The court stated that this case was not an appropriate forum to decide the nominee issue, because Petitioner’s wife was not a party to the case and it would not be appropriate to adjudicate her rights in the Wilmette property without her participation. [read post]
