Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 8801 - 8820
of 13,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2009, 3:57 pm
Many will be tempted to look to institutional repositories as the great hope for open electronic access to law reviews, but they're not. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
"We're a public sector organisation. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:31 pm
I jumped from #62 to #32 in the span of a year,5 with only a just-over-three-tenths-of-a-point bump in my GPA (e.g. a hair’s breadth greater than the difference between a B- and a B). [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:48 am
See e.g., Ehlers v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:10 pm
If you are looking for some scintillating reading this weekend (e.g. while you’re in the bathroom), you might want to give the Report’s China section a try. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:12 am
June 30, 2009 TO: All Insurers and Self-Insurers Authorized to Write Motor Vehicle Liability, Physical Damage and Mechanical Breakdown Insurance in New York State; and the New York Automobile Insurance Plan RE: Third Party Information Sharing for Sales Tax Compliance Purposes STATUTORY REFERENCE: New York Tax Law § 1136(i) The purpose of this Circular Letter is to advise insurers of a recent amendment to the New York Tax Law. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:40 am
You’re a professional now; you will distinguish yourself by your work. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This is not because I think these are the only aspects of Noel’s model that have value — they’re not. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 10:01 am
You need to know that the vendor will support the entire system, including the embedded software as long as you’re using it. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
It would likely make Supreme Court confirmations, like the one we’re about to experience, less politically charged and combative. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:11 am
If you're in charge of a website and haven't specifically protected against CSRF, chances are you're vulnerable. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
(E.g., plaintiff held X shares of stock, and the loss was Y dollars per share, so the damages were X x Y.) [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 pm
(E.g., plaintiff held X shares of stock, and the loss was Y dollars per share, so the damages were X x Y.) [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:42 am
They're used to relocation. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:31 am
Anyway, no need to complicate this post further, because we’re about to get to the real weird stuff. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 4:53 pm
We’re going to continue to see fights over those types of transactions. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:45 am
If you're a free trader (as I am), clearly it's good that some "free trade" agreements were passed. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
In most cases, we’re talking about very small amounts. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
(See, e.g., Racism in Thoroughly Modern Millie at I Love Newton.) [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:51 pm
ETRS has moved from the conceptual here’s-what-we’re-thinking-about stage to the drafted-and-almost-ready-for-prime-time stage. [read post]
