Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 21,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The question turned largely on whether plaintiff’s employer had exclusive control over defendant’s actions. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:55 pm
In other words, the defendant was not the plaintiff’s employer. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:55 am
The claim is deemed plausible if “the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:27 am
The court said there was no evidence that the defendants, the pitbull’s owner, had specific knowledge their dog might commit an “unprovoked attack on a stranger coming into the yard. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am
Take common sense intuitions about holding Akamai liable b/c it’s providing a service that can only be used to infringe. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:47 am
In a lead poisoning case, just as in any other negligence claim, a plaintiff must show: The defendant had a duty to the plaintiff to conform to a certain standard of conduct; The defendant failed to conform to that standard; The plaintiff suffered an injury; and The defendant’s failure caused the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:50 am
Pursuant to these instructions, if jurors found plaintiff’s employer had exclusive control over the site, it therefore had control over the contractor’s negligent actions and only the employer could be found liable. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm
… In no event will the company be liable for “defense costs” or other “loss” in excess of the applicable limit(s) of liability. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:17 pm
Supreme Court has held, is that if the railroad is responsible for the injury even slightly, the railroad is entirely liable. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:17 pm
Supreme Court has held, is that if the railroad is responsible for the injury even slightly, the railroad is entirely liable. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
The OIG places primary responsibility on drug manufacturers for ensuring that Part D members do not redeem copay coupons; however, pharmacies that accept coupons could also be held liable under the federal AKS, Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) Law or the FCA. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm
Prior to the crash the Defendant was drinking at a local pub. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:35 pm
Specifically, the State was deemed liable for a dangerous condition on the highway, and the victim’s family was awarded $12,690,000 in damages. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
The trial court agreed and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:54 am
The trial court agreed and granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
Tennessee Courts Consider When a Party Can Be Held Liable for an Agent’s Negligence, Tennessee Personal Injury Blog, October 12, 2016. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Melissa Bain, in her capacity as the personal representative of Heath’s estate, filed a medical-malpractice action against HKH and several other defendants, arguing that the emergency department nurses at the hospital and Dr. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:35 am
As such, she could be individually liable for FMLA interference. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:14 am
Newman held that a tippee who trades on insider information must know that the tipper received a “personal benefit” to be liable for insider trading. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:52 pm
It’s totally legal! [read post]