Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8801 - 8820 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2017, 10:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The question turned largely on whether plaintiff’s employer had exclusive control over defendants actions. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:55 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
 The claim is deemed plausible if “the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:27 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
The court said there was no evidence that the defendants, the pitbull’s owner, had specific knowledge their dog might commit an “unprovoked attack on a stranger coming into the yard. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Take common sense intuitions about holding Akamai liable b/c it’s providing a service that can only be used to infringe. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:47 am by Moll Law Group, Ltd
In a lead poisoning case, just as in any other negligence claim, a plaintiff must show: The defendant had a duty to the plaintiff to conform to a certain standard of conduct; The defendant failed to conform to that standard; The plaintiff suffered an injury; and The defendants failure caused the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:50 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Pursuant to these instructions, if jurors found plaintiff’s employer had exclusive control over the site, it therefore had control over the contractor’s negligent actions and only the employer could be found liable. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
… In no event will the company be liable for “defense costs” or other “loss” in excess of the applicable limit(s) of liability. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Supreme Court has held, is that if the railroad is responsible for the injury even slightly, the railroad is entirely liable. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Supreme Court has held, is that if the railroad is responsible for the injury even slightly, the railroad is entirely liable. [read post]
The OIG places primary responsibility on drug manufacturers for ensuring that Part D members do not redeem copay coupons; however, pharmacies that accept coupons could also be held liable under the federal AKS, Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) Law or the FCA. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:51 pm by emagraken
Prior to the crash the Defendant was drinking at a local pub. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:36 am by Eric Beasley
Tennessee Courts Consider When a Party Can Be Held Liable for an Agent’s Negligence, Tennessee Personal Injury Blog, October 12, 2016. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Melissa Bain, in her capacity as the personal representative of Heath’s estate, filed a medical-malpractice action against HKH and several other defendants, arguing that the emergency department nurses at the hospital and Dr. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 5:14 am by Michael Baudinet
Newman held that a tippee who trades on insider information must know that the tipper received a “personal benefit” to be liable for insider trading. [read post]