Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 19,436
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 1:44 am
Doesn’t matter. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:20 pm
(We can't offer this section by teleconference, which would enable even more people to benefit from the talk, but that's a completely different matter that I'm working on changing) Anyway, you are all fortunate to be reading my site, so sign up for the event and meet and hear Reid Trautz. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:47 pm
No matter which formula you use, your effective tax rate will always be lower than your marginal tax rate. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 3:57 pm
Ward, Employment Law Subject Matter Expert/Legal Writer and Editor CalChamber members can read more about the COVID-19 emergency temporary standard in IIPP and COVID-19 in the HR Library. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:10 am
Why isn't my information listed in the census? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:35 am
Thomas B. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:23 am
The answer appears to be found in the Tax Code at Section 7703(b). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:18 pm
The beauty of using the Government’s scutwork of categorizing federal crimes is that a) the Government is not going to leave any crimes uncategorized (and “Other offenses” is a small category); and b) I can use it as a framework for a discussion of the various types of offenses that actually tells the reader something about the subject matter, and is not just garbage intended to fill the page and attract keyword searches. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
They didn’t then because Cravath said they didn’t have to. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:42 am
id=350310 Single online sale of book in forum state didn’t confer personal jurisdiction over out of state seller for copyright infringement claim. http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/23/07/221885P.pdf Online market’s contributory liability for seller’s infringement of trademark rights depends on market’s “willful blindness” after notice of specific infringing uses. https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/07/24/21-56236.pdf … [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:05 pm
So if your a driver for a ride service, a delivery person for a delivery service, or a seamstress for a clothing company, you can’t be an independent contractor no matter how little control the company has over you. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 1:46 pm
So they considered it guaranteed at time A, and at time B they do not consider it guaranteed, even though nothing of legal significance has happened. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:17 pm
Really, don't. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:22 pm
Mobs don’t respect due process. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:45 am
It doesn’t matter who is in the photo or video, so long as they are under 18. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
Tara B. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
Since the ASHRM conference, I have received many requests for my list and decided to publish them here: A - Accept that it will happen to you B - Breach response policies are not only mandatory, they are helpful C - Compliance with policies and procedures is critical D - Data breach Fridays--the breach call always comes in at 6pm on a Friday E - Empathize with your customers/patients/employees--how are they going to react to your response? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
Judge Thynge also found the witness qualified under Rule 701(b). [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:21 pm
(b) I don't at the moment understand the difference between conclusions 2 and 3.] [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:45 am
Rockets Matter! [read post]
