Search for: "Matter of Law"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 234,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Sale or Closure of a Law Practice and Proper Handling of Aged Client Files 2023 Formal Ethics Opinion 1 was adopted April 21, 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Sale or Closure of a Law Practice and Proper Handling of Aged Client Files 2023 Formal Ethics Opinion 1 was adopted April 21, 2023. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
The legislature included a declaration that the law addresses “matters vitally affecting the public interest” and that violations of the law constitute an “unfair or deceptive act in trade or commerce,” which are required elements under the Washington Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:45 am
USCIRF called for a congressional hearing on the matter. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:36 am
Initially, the bill did not address the use of the Nazi salute, with federal law intending to leave the matter to the discretion of individual states. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
Recall, Snap demurs to “[a]ll causes of action alleged in the SAC – which are based on content created and exchanged by third parties – [as] barred as a matter of law under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
” The Federal Circuit also rejected GO’s argument that “[p]er se refusals based on the Informational Matter Doctrine are unconstitutional” because the Board did not make a per se refusal of GO’s mark merely because it contained informational material. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am
” The Federal Circuit also rejected GO’s argument that “[p]er se refusals based on the Informational Matter Doctrine are unconstitutional” because the Board did not make a per se refusal of GO’s mark merely because it contained informational material. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
This federal law means that it is implemented country-wide and supersedes conflicting state laws. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:29 am
The DC Circuit has made its interest in expedition clear by placing this matter on a rocket docket.) [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
Matters seem to have been handled smoothly until later 2020 although the level of grandparent involvement post adoption is not set forth in the opinion. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:16 am
House Republicans yesterday recommended that Hunter Biden be held in contempt of Congress over his failure to comply with a subpoena, in violation of federal law. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:08 am
We offer high-quality representation for the accused in Massachusetts, no matter the severity of the crime. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
Wolfe rattles off extreme proposals matter-of-factly as all viable options: Anyone concerned about the Supreme Court today should be working to prise that window open further. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:39 am
They are claiming that the law violates their First Amendment rights. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Over the past year, it finds, “the rates clients agreed to pay law firms for new matters grew by more than 6%, with every segment of law firms seeing aggressive increases in worked rates on par with the pace seen prior to the Great Financial Crisis of 2008-’11. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:15 am
The Appellate Division reversed the trial court and remanded the matter for a plenary hearing. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 1:04 am
Veerle Van Den Eeckhout (working at the CJEU) has published a short article on recent CJEU case law in Private International Law matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:00 am
If you have a post-decree problem you would like to address, it would be wise to contact an experienced family law lawyer in Illinois. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:26 pm
In a “hot” deal market, its worthwhile reiterating the fundamentals of regulatory due diligence that don’t change, no matter how attractive the deal or how short the window is to seize the opportunity. [read post]
