Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 9,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
My SSRN author page, with a selection of academic pieces on laws of war and just war theory, is here.) [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(2) Electronic notice, if the notice provided is consistent with the provisions regarding electronic records and signatures set forth in Section 7001 of Title 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Sometimes we only have IP address; sometimes we negotiate to narrow requests to avoid revealing unnecessary info.Pablo Peláez, Europol Representative to the United States: Cybercrime unit is interested in hate speech & propaganda. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Villafane stated that a personal handgun is one purchased with the officer’s own money (Tr. 47). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Villafane stated that a personal handgun is one purchased with the officer’s own money (Tr. 47). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
Indeed, we have previously recognized that administrative searches are not rendered invalid because they are accompanied by some degree of suspicion, see Bruce, 498 F.3d at 1242, and the Supreme Court has similarly noted that suspicion of criminal activity will not defeat an otherwise permissible administrative search, see United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
" That seems pretty clear, since Section 2412 says that it does not "alter[ ], modif[y], repeal[ ], invalidate[ ], or supersede[ ] any other provision of Federal law which authorizes an award of such fees and other expenses to any party other than the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 2:00 am
On information and belief, such illegal dissemination occurred in every jurisdiction in the United States, including this one. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
United States is, without a doubt, a “defense win. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
But it does remind me of the seminal case, United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am
S. 378, 384 (1987); United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:50 am
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
