Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
At some point thereafter, the United States moved him to Bagram in Afghanistan. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:53 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:08 pm
The petition of the day is: Skilling v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 2701; and Ranjit Thakur v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
United States, in which the state has asked it to overturn the lower courts’ decisions blocking enforcement of four provisions of its controversial immigration law, S.B. 1070. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am
City and County of Honolulu, 124 F.3d 1150 (9th Cir. 1997)) and state courts (Richardson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:15 am
The United States Supreme Court has just granted Arizona's petition for writ of certiorari in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
In urging Supreme Court review, the state’s petition (Arizona v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Patchak (Granted )Docket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States' sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:21 am
UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine whether Arizona's controversial immigration law [SB 1070 materials; JURIST news archive] is preempted by federal law. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
Baines v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:37 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
” At Power Line, John Hinderaker discusses the cert. petition in Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 14 (2010) (“[The petitioner] argues that the Federal Rules of Evidence and the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
United States, 11-7029, and Cain v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
(B) BUSINESS DIRECTED TO RESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
" Significantly, this will be one of the main points in the forthcoming petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court:In its petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, Appellee intends to raise the following issues:A. [read post]
