Search for: "S. et al" Results 8801 - 8820 of 29,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 10:25 am by Louis M. Solomon
., et al., 11 Civ. 2499 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)(DLC), provides a good synopsis of the law and practice of the federal courts on compelling non-signatories to arbitrate. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:10 am by Earl Drott
 Madalena Elizabeth Almanza et al., No. 21-0513, illustrates the difference between a pragmatic common-law approach, which empowers courts to void statutes they view as obsolete, and a formal textualist approach, which adheres to the ordinary meaning of the words enacted and leaves updating to the legislative branch. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:08 am by Steven Cohen
CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al – United States District Court – District of New Jersey – January 3rd, 2018) involves injuries sustained after defendant police officers pulled over the plaintiff in his vehicle. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:39 am by Steven Cohen
Maxus Properties Inc et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Arkansas – April 9th 2019) involves the death of Jannell Dillon. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:50 am
Issuing an unambiguous final decision indicating that all administrative appeals have been exhausted triggers the running of the statute of limitationsMatter of Janet Arnold, et al v Erie County Med. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by Jonathan H. Adler
”  The study, by Wakefield, et al., was the only study published in a respected medical journal reporting a potential link and was routinely cited by those claiming childhood vaccinations could cause autism, despite obvious flaws and a wealth of contrary research. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:58 pm by John F. Fullerton III
Administrative Review Board et al., (pdf), the Court issued a decision, consistent with prior decisions of several other Circuits, that affirmed the burden of proof standard applied by the Administrative Review Board (ARB) in its decision, which affirmed an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) decision that had dismissed the employee’s retaliation claim, but applied an erroneous standard in so doing. [read post]