Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8801 - 8820 of 15,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
§1225(b)(2)(C)—that allows immigration officials to “return” certain new entrants to a country that is “contiguous” to the United States while those foreign nationals await a full hearing before an immigration judge. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm by Marco Rossi
(b) in the case of trusts:  (i) the settlor;  (ii) the trustee(s);  (iii) the protector, if any;  (iv) the beneficiaries, or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; (v) any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
The audit would need to: (1) be performed by an independent public accountant that meets the standards of independence in rule 2-01(b) and (c) of Regulation S-X that is registered with and subject to regular inspection of the PCAOB; (2) meet the definition of audit in rule 1-02(d) of Regulation S-X, the professional engagement period of which shall begin and end as indicated in Regulation S-X rule 2-01(f)(5); and (3) be prepared in accordance with GAAP,… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Another issue involved O'Connor's receiving disability benefits pursuant to Section 207-c of the General Municipal Law following a work-related injury at the time he moved to Warren County. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a states about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the states chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel… [read post]
5 May 2012, 9:22 pm by Pamela
The statute requires the State to consider four essential facts: (a) a transfer occurred; (b) there was no adequate consideration; (c) the gift was a material portion of the decedent’s estate; and (d) the gift occurred within three years of the decedent’s death. [read post]