Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 8801 - 8820 of 21,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
After a long argument about grammar, the Court will decide whether a mandatory minimum ten-year sentence enhancement for a child-pornography conviction triggered by a prior state law conviction for sexual abuse applies even when the prior conviction did not “involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm by Brian Toth
Today, the Eleventh Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Fuentes-Rangel v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
  State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlPhillip v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am by John Floyd
” One of those cases was the 2012 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm by J
We also know from the Supreme Court decision in R (SG) v Secretary of State [2015] UKSC 16 that the cap breaches the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child for cutting support to children for reasons which are unrelated to the needs of that child. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Clips were long enough for a child to read three sentences out loud. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The complaint fails to state that the child sustained so much as a bruise, redness or swelling. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
The complaint fails to state that the child sustained so much as a bruise, redness or swelling. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:15 am by Kate Fort
Having disparate interpretations of ICWA was certainly not the intent of Congress in passing a federal law, and conflicts with the rationale of the Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, the Court will spell out when a mandatory minimum prison sentence is required under a federal law against child pornography, based on a prior conviction under state law for sexual abuse. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am by Juan C. Antúnez
By the way, this presumption was reflected (if not explicitly stated) by the 1st DCA in Cody v. [read post]