Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 8801 - 8820
of 28,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
The story of policy at the state level is rosier, with California leading the way in the 1990s and early 2000s, but increasingly joined by other states. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:05 pm
This will be the first case reaching the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of such state bans since the Justices in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
“Class Action Litigation After Dukes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
The case, Concepcion v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:22 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:10 pm
In early 2005, in Beck v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Showcased most prominently in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
Part V explains the relevance of the consistent approaches and argues that ICSID tribunals have established a jurisprudence constante in dealing with SCEs that confirms their access as claimants in investor-state disputes. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:29 am
Privacy Shield invalid in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am
This new ruling may cause employers to reconsider plans that call for a flat level of reimbursement regardless of the level of usage of the phone and that provide no mechanism for employees to request additional reimbursement. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm
In Greene v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:49 pm
However, after being appealed, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded the case, stating that the district court should apply a heightened level of skepticism in determining whether Unum abused its discretion.[3] Under this heightened level of skepticism, the Court found in favor of Gary. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 am
Foster v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
The case is State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:22 pm
Trades Council, etc. v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Barron v. [read post]
