Search for: "State v. Save" Results 8801 - 8820 of 11,767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 10:53 am by Meg
There will be respect for role of state law, but right now no decision on whether to have state/regional offices of CFPB. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 7:05 am by Bexis
  We're content with that post stating all the many policy and practical reasons why such consolidations are prejudicial to the defense of cases (which is why plaintiffs seek them and some courts allow them), difficult for jurors to make sense of, and otherwise a bad idea.In that vein we applaud the decision in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am by Eric E. Johnson
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
The best chance to save the petitioner was the brain damage, and the jury and state courts were not persuaded. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324, 327, 113 S.Ct. 2106, 124 L.Ed.2d 228 (1993); see also §§ 301(a), 1321; Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Emissions Of Greenhouse Gases In The United States 2009 Karuk Tribe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, and to lessen or avert… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
S170577: I attended the oral argument today at the California Supreme Court for Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am by Adam Wagner
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]