Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8801 - 8820 of 19,629
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 2:47 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in J.D.B. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am by Amy Howe
For example, Scalia wrote the court’s 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm by Jennifer Lynch
And last summer, all nine justices on the Supreme Court agreed with this premise in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
In Bilski v Kappos, 130 S Ct 3218 (2010) the majority of the US Supreme Court held the business method patent at issue to be unpatentable as claiming an “abstract idea” (13). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:10 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
The Article V process is unusual in that neither the President nor the Supreme Court may review Congress's decisions.At a minimum, this means that members of Congress will have to take a position next year on ERA ratification. [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:51 pm by Josh Blackman
AFSCME (2018), the Supreme Court overruled Abood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
Additional similar requests are expected.Even with a sea change in administration policies expected, NOW will still hold its annual Roe v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm by Guest Blogger
The history we excavate in fact bears on arguments in two abortion cases now before the Court —Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:13 pm by Steve Vladeck
[Those interested in a more sustained discourse on this body of law should check out Part I of Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Sanders v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:10 pm
  The IPKat in his favourite holiday retreatKicking right in the week, court report from the UK: Sky v SkyKick - no CJEU reference re removal of own name defence to EUTMs ruled Birss J. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm by Amy Howe
The FCC and a group that includes the National Association of Broadcasters, Fox Corporation and Sinclair Corporation asked the Supreme Court to weigh in. and the justices agreed to do so in a pair of consolidated cases: FCC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
How to lose both your two trade marks and still come out on top ...The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), is a recent decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am by Doug B.
In addition, plenty of federal sentencing issues in the post-Booker world are still roiling district and circuit courts. [read post]