Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
We hold today that in light of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
United States, 713 F.2d 1558, 1561 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Millett, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:14 am
United States [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
"Given the lengthy debates and disagreements among Members of Congress as to the handling of these detainees, and the perception that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit failed to follow this Court's direction in Rasul v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 1:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeAccused Khat Smuggler Denied Suppression; Probable Cause Existed as to Knowledge of Package Contents United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Millett will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of California. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
United States U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 2:33 pm
United States, No. 06-10993 (D. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Mission The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Estonia to the United Nations v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
United States Department of Justice U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:42 am
United States, 127 S. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 10:30 pm
" United States Attorney's Manual Standards for Consideration of Clemency Petitions § 1-2.112. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 10:52 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967). [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:51 pm
United States, 454 U.S. 204, 208-09 (1981), which prohibits the state from not challenging standing below then raising it on appeal: The Government initially seeks to avert our consideration of the Fifth Circuit's decision by suggesting that petitioner may, regardless of the merits of that decision, lack an expectation of privacy in the house sufficient to prevail on his Fourth Amendment claim. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:50 pm
The Regional Director found appropriate the petitioned-for unit, which encompassed only the historical unit previously represented by the Petitioner, Baton Rouge Building & Construction Trades Council. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeIn Rejecting Conviction, Appeals Panel Rules on Need For Intent to Defraud Under 18 USC §505 Forgery United States v. [read post]
