Search for: "VI"
Results 8801 - 8820
of 13,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College, heard 1 February 2017. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 1:24 pm
VI), 873 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2017) and Lindstrom v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 1:44 pm
The investment practices here were messy and should be fixed.What does the Indiana constitution have to see about the duties of the Governor vis-a-viz the Treasurer? [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 4:55 pm
Originalism should be no different.In Part VI, I focus on Judge Wilkinson's more nuanced critique of Heller. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:02 am
Na visão da relatora, há algumas questões relevantes no processo. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:02 pm
The claims in this lawsuit, brought in Indiana federal court, are as follows: Count I: Trademark Counterfeiting Count II: Trademark Infringement Count III: False Designation of Origin Pursuant to § 43(a) of the Lanham Act Count IV: Common Law Trademark Infringement Count V: Civil Action under Indiana Code § 34-24-3-1 for Recovery of Damages, Costs, and Fees Arising from Defendants’ Conversion in Violation of Indiana Code § 35-43-4-3 Count VI: Civil Action under… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:33 pm
In context, it appears to refer to the district court duties set out in Subchapter VI of Chapter 15A—conducting the first appearance, appointing counsel, reviewing conditions of release, and making probable cause determinations (if not waived). [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:56 am
In Part VI, I discuss possible limits on the right to defy: for instance, perhaps the defiant person's behavior may still be punishable if it's independently wrongful (e.g., fighting words); if it has the specific purpose of provoking violence; if forbidding that behavior imposes only a modest intrusion on liberty (one possible rationale for a limited duty to retreat); if the behavior is legal but constitutionally unprotected; or if her defiance is unreasonable. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:34 pm
Cataloging these items for the Web is a monumental task, but the results are breathtaking: See, for example, “Statham’s Abridgment,” a collection of 15th-century English Year Book cases from the time of Henry VI; or Bracton’s law treatise from the early to mid-1200s; or the Ruhleben civilian internment camp papers from World War I; or the ongoing project to digitize the 1 million pages of documents related to the Nuremberg Trials—all online. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:45 pm
§ 41.37; vi. reply brief under 37 C.F.R. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:12 am
The delay of these regulations is giving way to some confusion among law enforcement and the public as to the parameters of legal vis a vie illegal pot possession. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:41 pm
., the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the following claims: assault (Counts I, VIII, and XV), battery (Counts II, IX, and XVI), negligence (Counts III, X, and XVII), products liability (Counts IV, XI, and XVIII), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts V, XII, and XIX), gross negligence (VI, XIII, and XX), and res ipsa loquitur (Counts VII, XIV, and XI). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(vi) does more innovation come from large companies or small companies, or is there an interdynamic relationship between the two? [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:30 am
In this next post on the law review submission process (see intro, part I, part II on timing of submissions,part III interview, part IV interview, part V interview and part VI interview if interested) I am exploring the expedited review. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
VI. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:17 am
Three counts invoke federal and state wiretapping statutes (Counts I, III, and VI if you’re scoring at home). [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 6:36 pm
All such claims shall be subject to the grievance and arbitration procedures (Article V and VI) as the sole and exclusive remedy for violations. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
Bakke first sued the University of California in a state court, alleging that the medical school’s admission policy violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm
Article VI, Section 2 of the U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 12:07 pm
” Finally, the new TCPA rules prohibit all previously exempted, non-marketing calls unless the caller has established do-not-call practices and procedures including: (i) Maintaining a written do-not-call list policy that is available on demand; (ii) Training personnel on the existence and use of the do-not-call list; (iii) Recording and honoring do-not-call requests within 30 days; (iv) Providing the called party with the name of the individual caller, the name of the person or… [read post]
