Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 31,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Box v Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc., 587 U. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
In Gur Narain Das & Anr. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:10 am
This post on SCOTUSblog has a good round-up of the media coverage of yesterday's decision, particularly the various editorials:Anger and Restraint, New York TimesNo death penalty for child rape, Los Angeles TimesChild rapist escapes death but not tough justice, USA TodayKennedy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:22 pm
More on Coker v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 11:43 am
In JMC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Related blog posts: Chicago Jury Finds in Favor of a Severely Brain Damaged Child Illinois Birth Injury Lawsuit Criticizes Nurses For Chain of Command Breakdown – 9.5 Million Settlement in The Northern Trust Company, et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:24 pm
The first, U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:39 pm
” — this might qualify as either incitement of imminent criminal conduct, or as constitutionally unprotected solicitation of crime (see United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:00 am
Poole v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:45 am
Heldmann, etc. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:51 am
In Vasquez v Vasquez, 2013 WL 7045041 (N.D.Tex.) [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 9:06 am
Leitgeib v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In La Salle v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:27 am
It was axiomatic that an unaccompanied asylum seeker who claimed to be a child should be given, where an assessment of his age was being conducted by a local authority, a fair and proper opportunity, at a stage when a possible adverse decision was no more than provisional, to deal with important points adverse to his age case which weighed against him. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:48 am
When making directions pursuant to s 497A of the Education Act 1996 (as inserted by s 8 of the School Standard and Framework Act 1998) to remove an office holder, the Secretary of State could, in certain circumstances, put the wider interests of child safeguarding above the interest of an individual office holder to be treated fairly. [read post]
