Search for: "Claimant(s)"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 26,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Even when there is overwhelming evidence in the medical records of a claimant's condition, they simply discount the effect the condition has on the claimant's ability to work. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
The land surrounding the Claimant’s bungalow has been acquired for this redevelopment. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:35 am
The McCravy case involved sympathetic facts for the claimant. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:34 am
”On appeal, the district court affirmed the JCC, but certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: Do the amended provisions of Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (2003), clearly and unambiguously establish the percentage fee formula provided therein as the sole standard for determining the reasonableness of an attorney’s fee to be awarded a claimant? [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:30 am
Hunt, Ringler’s President and CEO and Mark Vogel, head of the Ringler Leadership Team talk about what’s new and what it means for claimants, attorneys and our partners. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:52 pm
Mystic Transportation, 202 F.3d 129, 137 (2d Cir. 2000) (employer first cited declining profit as the motivation for claimant's dismissal, then in litigation relied upon claimant's poor job performance); EEOC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:52 am
An excellent question that no one has been able figure out, but rest assured the VA has interrupted claimant’s benefits that have only returned one form. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:55 am
That’s the starting point for a trained attorney who’s handling the case on behalf of the insured and disabled claimant. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:46 am
CA Nov. 25, 2014).In the ERISA context, an administrator must consider a claimant’s inability to perform his specific job requirements of a position in light of the relevant symptoms and medical conditions. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:30 am
The Article argues that other amendments in Senate Bill 669 are complete “game changers,” including: (1) codification of the last responsible employer doctrine; (2) reducing benefits because of prior impairments from non-occupational factors; (3) limiting a claimant’s choice of physician to a physician designated in a carrier’s “health care panel;” (4) abolishing the Second Injury Fund; (5) calculating a… [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 4:51 am
Oddo’s driveway that allegedly contained asbestos. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:25 am
Code § 2017.220 (prohibiting discovery of claimant's prior sexual conduct during discovery absent a proper showing of good cause); Cal. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Progressive Insurance Company's CEO has admitted that its investigators have done exactly this. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Progressive Insurance Company's CEO has admitted that its investigators have done exactly this. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
Progressive Insurance Company's CEO has admitted that its investigators have done exactly this. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:52 pm
One woman alleged that, after she complained about the company's gender discrimination tactics, her superiors punished her -- in direct violation of federal prohibitions against employer retaliation. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:04 am
Judge Nealon noted that “[a] dispute between an insurer and a claimant regarding the value of a UIM claim is not uncommon, and, standing alone, does not create a triable issue of fact as to the insured’s bad faith. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 12:27 pm
The Worker's Compensation Board found that the claimant did not have standing as a "spouse" to assert the death benefits claim. [read post]
30 May 2022, 3:01 am
The store’s witness further conceded that: the spillage of cake flour on the floor would pose a danger; there was a stack of 12.5 kg flours packed in the area where the claimant slipped and fell. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 6:18 pm
In order to invoke the circuit court's jurisdiction under HRS § 91-14 regarding judicial review of contested cases, four requirements must be met: the proceeding that resulted in the unfavorable agency action must have been a "contested case" hearing-- i.e., a hearing that was (1) required by law and (2) determined the "rights, duties, and privileges of specific parties"; the agency's action… [read post]
