Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 112,801
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm
The defendant argues that Vidino’s testimony should be excluded because he does not have specialized knowledge about the al-Nusrah Front and that his testimony about ISIS and other terrorist organizations is not relevant. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm
The defendant argues that Vidino’s testimony should be excluded because he does not have specialized knowledge about the al-Nusrah Front and that his testimony about ISIS and other terrorist organizations is not relevant. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
The defendant Richard A. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
Moreover, Defendant‘s [c]ounterclaims for patent misuse and unclean hands depend entirely on finding that Plaintiff improperly listed the [patent-in-suit] in the Orange Book [as alleged in defendant's first counterclaim], making these claims redundant. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:41 am
“VIP Products insists its “Heinie Sniff’n” dog toy does not violate Heineken’s trademarks. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
Although Diamond had been dissolved for many years, plaintiffs sought recovery from unexhausted liability insurance that covered defendant during the decades when it did business in California. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
The defendants also maintained that Doe had entered a confined space despite knowing he was not permitted to do so. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
Although the statutory test does not require that a defendant actually suffer prejudice in order for a court to find that the proceedings were impaired, the test to determine impairment is, nonetheless, very precise and very high. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
Determine whether there are any other factors that make it appropriate to grant a mandatory injunction at an interim stage (even if the court does not feel highly assured that the claimant will establish its right). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 4:39 pm
Another vice of duplicity is that a general verdict of guilty does not disclose whether the jury found the defendant guilty of one crime or of both. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:06 am
He does it both to keep cases moving and to protect the public from defendants who might drive drunk while they're awaiting their day in court. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm
A Nassau Family Lawyer said that, this is a motion by the plaintiff (hereafter wife) for an order 1) adjudging the defendant (hereafter husband) in contempt; 2) enforcing the parties' judgment of divorce; 3) granting her a money judgment for accrued arrears; 4) awarding her counsel fees; 5) awarding her costs (damages) incurred as a result of the husband's breach of the parties' stipulation of settlement; and 6) directing the husband to comply with the provisions of the… [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:53 am
What does that mean? [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
But it gives you a flavor of how adamantly Texas seeks to defend its judgment. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The First does make a couple of interesting points about recent sentencing jurisprudence: of the three decisions cited by Defendant, only Kimbrough addresses a district court's decision-making. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
That a reasonable explanation might exist does not negate reasonable suspicion. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:15 am
June 15, 2011).* Defendant’s vague request for the court to review defense counsel’s performance without saying what it was that he failed to do or show prejudice does not show ineffective assistance. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm
It does not matter, explains the 9th, which reverses and amends with instructions to put registration as a condition. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
Both plaintiff and defendant were swingers. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm
If the defendant does not go to court, the bond is ordered forfeited by court. [read post]