Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 8821 - 8840 of 112,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm by Steven Cohen
The defendant argues that Vidino’s testimony should be excluded because he does not have specialized knowledge about the al-Nusrah Front and that his testimony about ISIS and other terrorist organizations is not relevant. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 12:25 pm by Steven Cohen
The defendant argues that Vidino’s testimony should be excluded because he does not have specialized knowledge about the al-Nusrah Front and that his testimony about ISIS and other terrorist organizations is not relevant. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am by The Docket Navigator
Moreover, Defendant‘s [c]ounterclaims for patent misuse and unclean hands depend entirely on finding that Plaintiff improperly listed the [patent-in-suit] in the Orange Book [as alleged in defendant's first counterclaim], making these claims redundant. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:41 am
“VIP Products insists its “Heinie Sniff’n” dog toy does not violate Heineken’s trademarks. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
Although Diamond had been dissolved for many years, plaintiffs sought recovery from unexhausted liability insurance that covered defendant during the decades when it did business in California. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The defendants also maintained that Doe had entered a confined space despite knowing he was not permitted to do so. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
Although the statutory test does not require that a defendant actually suffer prejudice in order for a court to find that the proceedings were impaired, the test to determine impairment is, nonetheless, very precise and very high. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
 Determine whether there are any other factors that make it appropriate to grant a mandatory injunction at an interim stage (even if the court does not feel highly assured that the claimant will establish its right). [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 4:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Another vice of duplicity is that a general verdict of guilty does not disclose whether the jury found the defendant guilty of one crime or of both. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:06 am by The Law Offices of David S. Shrager
He does it both to keep cases moving and to protect the public from defendants who might drive drunk while they're awaiting their day in court. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A Nassau Family Lawyer said that, this is a motion by the plaintiff (hereafter wife) for an order 1) adjudging the defendant (hereafter husband) in contempt; 2) enforcing the parties' judgment of divorce; 3) granting her a money judgment for accrued arrears; 4) awarding her counsel fees; 5) awarding her costs (damages) incurred as a result of the husband's breach of the parties' stipulation of settlement; and 6) directing the husband to comply with the provisions of the… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by Rory Little
But it gives you a flavor of how adamantly Texas seeks to defend its judgment. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:48 am
The First does make a couple of interesting points about recent sentencing jurisprudence: of the three decisions cited by Defendant, only Kimbrough addresses a district court's decision-making. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
That a reasonable explanation might exist does not negate reasonable suspicion. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:15 am
June 15, 2011).* Defendant’s vague request for the court to review defense counsel’s performance without saying what it was that he failed to do or show prejudice does not show ineffective assistance. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Jon Sands
It does not matter, explains the 9th, which reverses and amends with instructions to put registration as a condition. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm
If the defendant does not go to court, the bond is ordered forfeited by court. [read post]