Search for: "High v State"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
Sinclair Collis Limited, The Members of National Association of Cigarette Machine Operators (Interested Party) v Secretary of State for Health [2010] EWHC 3112 (Admin) – Read judgment or Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision The High Court has ruled that the Secretary of State for Health did not breach the human right to peaceful enjoyment of property or European Union law by banning the sale of tobacco products from automatic vending machines. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
The Obergefell discussion also includes United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
(quoting State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Coleman v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm
He was wholeheartedly in favor of declaring that what went on between the school’s sponsoring church and its disobedient teacher was none of the government’s business, shielded behind a high wall of separation between church and state (higher, indeed, than Scalia usually is willing to defend). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:54 am
A better example is United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:01 am
United States OT 2016 – Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
In summary: PJS’s application for an interim injunction was refused by the High Court on 15 January. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Rucho and Covington v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:12 am
[v] Mridual Chadha [vi] Press Information Bureau. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
” State v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm
Indeed, Brandenburg v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:34 pm
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:34 pm
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:31 am
United States (1998), more than Staples v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:29 am
Chief Judge runoff- February 12th, high noon. [read post]
