Search for: "House v. House"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 41,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:10 pm
The post For this relief, much thanks appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:09 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
.: The House Armed Services Committee's Future of Defense Task Force will hold its inaugural hearing on theories of victory. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:35 am
Facts: This case (State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am
This portion of the act was written in response to the ruling of Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
One big chunk of them (added by the initiative) said you can't build houses on the hillside. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 8:07 am
We often tell students that one risk of bringing a false advertising claim, as a competitor, is that there might be counterclaims if you don't have your own house in order. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
We were pleased that almost every book covered Slaughter-House. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am
Plumbing Corp. v Parklot Holding Co., 44 Misc 3d 1218(A) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014]). [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:25 am
Colworth House, Unilever's Research and Development Facility Author Lecomte99 Copyright waived by the author Source Wikipedia Colworth House Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black and Lord Kitchin) Shanks v Unilever Plc [2019] UKSC 45 (23 Oct 2019) Nowadays most commercially successful inventions in the United Kingdom are made by [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
Its deficiencies were acknowledged in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, para 46. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 1:00 pm
OUI-Drugs, DRE’s, and a Maine Judicial Conference Panel. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
Emambee v London Borough of Islington (2019) EWHC 2835 (QB) We saw what seemed like a rather harsh refusal on permission to bring a s.204 Housing Act 1996 homelessness appeal out of time in London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) (our note). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
| AIPPI Congress Report 1: The Art of IP - Museums & Architecture | AIPPI Congress Report 2: Trade Secrets - Views from In-House Counsel | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Brexit, IP in Fashion and Customs & Border Control | Monday Miscellany | Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d’auteur | Guest Post: Copyright Troll-[ing] Canadian Courts? [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 9:27 am
Case citation: Wexler v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 4:56 am
Bostock v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:47 pm
Fox v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:38 pm
[An amicus filing in the case challenging the Emergency Declaration's diversion of funds towards building the Wall] Our friends at the Cato Institute have submitted an amicus brief (jointly with NYU's Brennan Center for Justice) on behalf of the plaintiff in the case of Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
K.C. may use the money to buy a special van for transporting the girl and to build a house that accommodates the child’s needs. [read post]
