Search for: "House v. State"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Also, abandoning the house for personal use and then trying to sell it shortly thereafter (and claiming it is now held primarily for investment) is likely not sufficient under 1031 (although holding the property for a while after abandoning it for personal use may work...see Moore v CIR (2007)). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Supreme Court in Magner v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:18 pm
Based on this settlement, the Church states that it concluded its purchase of the Phillips Property for $3 million. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Daman v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:00 pm
v=WyfOyl5HetA&NR=1 Glenn Beck- Puerto Rico Could Become 51st State If New Bill Passes http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices express skepticism over using legislative motive in pre-emption analysis
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm
The second of these two cases, Windsor v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
United States (water rights) and denied in Lomas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 7:26 am
It is not unknown for HL decisions to be influenced by politics (for example Lord Hoffmans judgement in Birmingham City Council v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Consider Lucia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:16 pm
Yellen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:40 am
D’Aubigny v Khan & Anor (2025) EWCA Civ 11 (Not on Bailii yet, a copy of the judgment is here.) [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:16 am
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 12:51 pm
As demonstrated on television police must give warnings commonly known as the Miranda warnings, named after the United States Supreme Court decision Miranda v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:35 pm
Related posts:Fire Evacuation of Building Puts Freeze on ITAP 2d Circuit Review: Connecticut v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
Agelicare, LLC v St. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
Smith informed them that he had found an investor who was willing to buy the house for $50,000. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:45 pm
The Constitution, however, did not allow the House to block Powell, because he had met all of the requirements of office listed in the Constitution.In US Term Limits v. [read post]
