Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL" Results 8821 - 8840 of 15,754
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 4:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But Scalia countered: “They’re also told that the judge is ultimately going to decide whether your recommendation stands, or not. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm by Brad Kuhn
It’s not every day you’re involved in a successful eminent domain case before the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The appellate court upheld the lower court’s ruling that found the State Lands Commission (“SLC”) violated CEQA when it approved a land exchange with the City of San Francisco involving a waterfront parcel of land near the S.F. [read post]
The bill states that the rules remain the same as they have been since 1993 (as expressly embraced by the Industrial Welfare Commission in 2000). [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/0XsWwsMu4Y -> UK court to rule on whether Uber breaches rules on taximeters http://t.co/r41Xag0dgt -> The CJEU's safe harbour ruling – the questions and answers in the aftermath http://t.co/dexRESaobQ -> The SEC Opens Up a New Front in the Cybersecurity Wars http://t.co/dnAYs72t2l -> US–EU Safe Harbor – Struck Down! [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 2:16 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
Binding Rules for Rightsholders, Soft Guidelines for Users If you skim the chapter without knowing what you're looking for, it may come across as being quite balanced, including references to the need for IP rules to further the “mutual advantage of producers and users” (QQ.A.X), to “facilitate the diffusion of information” (QQ.A.Z), and recognizing the “importance of a rich and accessible public domain” (QQ.B.x). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Amul Kalia
And President Obama seems to be trying to find a middle ground, eschewing legal mandates but continuing to informally pressure companies to provide unencrypted access to data. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Pending Trade-marks Act Amendment Will Permit Purging of Records http://t.co/3i2nTQQYDR -> Law Society of British Columbia Rule Change Re: Cloud Computing in the Legal Industry http://t.co/3NSxVPK29X -> New CJEU reference on linking and copyright: is streaming unlawful content an infringement? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
So on what basis should there be a departure from the usual rule here? [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 12:06 am by Andrew Trask
 And it’s true that, on its face, pleading in the alternative is not legal grounds for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   See, e.g., In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation, 80 F. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:48 am by Elizabeth Kruska
In re: A.M., Juvenile2015 VT 109By Amy DavisThe fall of 2011 bore a child by the initials A.M. [read post]