Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 8821 - 8840 of 12,726
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
By 1988, LAO LAW was producing legal opinions at a rate of more than 5,000 per year for legal aid lawyers (lawyers in private practice who do legal aid cases). [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
While the media and Congress essentially view his confirmation as a foregone conclusion, that didn't stop us from voicing our opinions not only about Roberts, but also about the process. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  To change the result in Weeks would require more than one justice to change their minds. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Circuit indicates that he would have been fairly deferential to regulatory agencies – certainly far more deferential than was Justice Scalia. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 pm by Randy Barnett
But no.In addition to groping for some way to describe inactivity as activity so as to bring the mandate under existing doctrine, the government has also relied upon a concurring opinion of Justice Scalia that Congress may reach noneconomic activity that is “essential” to the regulation of interstate commerce — an opinion in which Justice Scalia uses the terms “activity” or “activities” forty-two times. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
This difference of opinion in important both to the instant case and to future assessments in this area. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:25 pm
  Interestingly, the Court's opinion appears to resolve, without actually acknowledging the existence of, considerable confusion about whether recklessness is a subjective or objective standard, or even a little of both. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
” In a 5-4 unsigned opinion, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to imagine a similar re-imagination of Obergefell as a decision that thwarts rather than serves gay liberation. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 6:10 pm
  If the judge is consistent, the cop eventually gets the idea.When Chief Justice Warren ordered his clerks to draft the Terry opinion, he and they had seven years of experience to reflect upon, and that was enough time for reality to pluck up courage to voice its complaints against doctrine. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am by Legal Beagle
The judges also said their ruling was not entirely retrospective, and left the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission to determine if closed cases may be referred back to the High Court : This decision does not permit closed cases to be re-opened. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:35 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Chief Justice Earl Warren, appointed in 1953 and confirmed on March 1, 1954 ************************************* Meanwhile, in Texas, Mexicans had long been considered “white,” with their coloring analyzed extensively in the case In re Rodriguez, 81 Fed. 337 (W.D. [read post]