Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 8821 - 8840 of 10,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
There are three principal components of the Universal Protocol:  conducting a preprocedure verification process, marking the procedure site, and performing a time-out before the procedure. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:01 pm by Michael Geist
The case is notable since it demonstrates how critics of greater fair dealing flexibility have greatly exaggerated claims of potential harm. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm by Bexis
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
This September marks the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:05 am by Mairead Enright
This legislation clearly marks a watershed moment in the continuing history of Irish family life. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
   Some strains are harmful to animals, some to humans, and some to both. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:13 pm
A bicycle, painted white and covered in flowers, marked the site in Newport Beach where 43-year-old Michael William Nine was fatally hit. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:34 am
This Kat believes that this type of threatening conduct by large corporations can actually be more damaging to the reputation of their overall brand than the harm a small business name would actually cause to their trade marks. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am by Jeff Gamso
This started out to be a comment on Mark Bennett's latest (as I write this) post on "Justice" and "justice. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:50 am by Sara Stadler
As Lemley and McKenna write, “[t]he idea that a mark owner is harmed because a defendant interferes with its ability to expand operates on a presumption that the mark owner ought to have the right to expand without interference. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:11 am
The government also goes to great lengths to warn us about other potentially harmful situations. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm by Steven J. Malman
Quinn says that the "historic legislation" marks the beginning of a "new era" of nursing home care in the state. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 9:51 am
 Therefore, such an injunction must be carefully tailored to eliminate only the specific harm alleged. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Kelly
– Microsoft issue staff with Windows 7 phones (Property, intangible) US Patents – Decisions District Court Delaware – Amazon’s infringing use of One-Click technology didn’t irreparably harm digital identity business sufficient to warrant permanent injunction: Cordance Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am by Dan Markel
John Wunder (do you measure damages by the actual harm to the non-breaching party or by the literal terms of the contract?) [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:48 am by Laura Orr
” (Print copy available at the Washington County Law Library.)5) “Making News: Talking with the Media,” by Mark J. [read post]