Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8821 - 8840
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
In this context, he referred to several long lasting cases, including Arcol v Capol (T-402/07, T-164/02, C-193/09) which took over 14 years until a final decision was reached. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
Douglas Jarrett of Keller and Heckman in Beyond Telecom Law Blog Will SoftBank’s Windfall from Alibaba Be Enough for Sprint to Buy T-Mobile? [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:54 am
” Well, Mark, that’s all very nice, but now you’ve made the big time! [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:39 am
The new rules don’t provide any exemption for MVPD consent. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am
” A 1000+ word report by the New York Times talks about Florida engineer Mark Hood, who was consulted in the lawsuit of the family of Brooke Melton against GM. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:51 pm
It also includes ditches, except in upland areas that don’t contribute flow to a jurisdictional water. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Arguing for CLS Bank, Mark Perry argued that these two cases determine the outcome here. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:37 am
Denimafia has used the marks on “men’s t-shirts, woven shirts, jackets, chinos jeans, and casual suits, as well as women’s dresses and skirts. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 11:08 pm
Accordingly, BBW has not established as a matter of law that it has priority over Summit with respect to the Twilight mark. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
” (Some Justices may ask whether all the arguments are “fairly included” within this question, but that won’t be the main event.) [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:38 pm
(Here’s a post from criminal defense lawyer Mark Bennett, making a similar observation.) [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 4:52 pm
The blog will provide key insight and practical guidance on competition and antitrust matters, in addition to providing commentary on foreign investment developments. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:32 am
As a general matter, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
As just noted, the General Court decided to annul the Board of Appeal’s decision, for the reason explained below.The informed user of radiatorsRecalling the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) decision in Case C-281/10 Grupo Promer, the General Court noted that the informed user (I have quoted Grupo Promer itself, rather than rely on the slightly different wording my translation gives me in this case):“must be understood as lying somewhere between that of the average… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Dividing up a state certainly could affect individual rights, but such a division is first and foremost a matter of structure: structure is literally all about the edifice, about how something is put together, about constituent parts and elements, and how they do—or don’t—fit together to form a whole. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
Further, they concluded that the anomalies referred to by NLC gave no grounds for doubting the veracity of the content of the 1986 agreement and that, therefore, the NLC’s trade mark was to be annulled.NLC's reaction, in thelanguage of the proceedingsThe General Court (GC) however took a different view in Case T-404/10. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
We find this concern applicable in the present case.529 U.S. at 869-70 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:50 pm
Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
This is a background rule of general application, no matter what. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:29 am
Or at least, the agency argued further, an employer shouldn’t be able to recover attorneys’ fees in pursuit of such a defense. [read post]
