Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8821 - 8840 of 13,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-9540, grant limited to the first question raised). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
  It is, in fact, impossible to conceive how it could have done so more overtly than in Bush v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:27 am
In 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Earlier this month, United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg withheld his blessings from the proposed $20 million settlement in Fraley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Another patent settlement case that has been brewing for a while is in California State Court and involves patent settlement agreements between Bayer AG and several generic drug manufacturers with respect to generic versions of Bayer’s antibiotic drug CIPRO (ciprofloxacin HCl). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (1968) (391US404) — Treaty Rights Survived Termination v. (24) Oneida County v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by jn92
In this case, the source is a set of books published by the United States government that contains the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:02 am
 Many of these suits received class action status and were removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:02 am
 Many of these suits received class action status and were removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm by Josephine Liu
  As we blogged about here, the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Michael Schmidt
An interesting decision was just issued by the California Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) in Juror Number One v. [read post]