Search for: "State v. Price" Results 8821 - 8840 of 11,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
October 13, 2022 | Negotiating Prices with Drug Manufacturers | The Inflation Reduction Act aims to constrain rapidly increasing drug prices in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm by Bona Law PC
Similarly, in September 2015, KYB, a Japanese company, agreed to plead guilty for its role in a conspiracy to fix the prices of shock absorbers installed in cars and motorcycles sold in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  If we don’t restrict reimportation, we should accept a single price and a loss of ability to fund R&D. [read post]
31 May 2016, 11:52 am by Larry Tolchinsky
For instance, if there was a fire after the sales contract was signed and the condo is gutted, then the buyer may still be legally responsible for paying the seller the full purchase price as stated in their contract. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm by Lisa Baird
Distributions are not made in proportion to ownership interest, or physician-owners pay different prices for their ownership interests, because of the expected or actual volume or value of devices used by the physicians. [read post]