Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8821 - 8840
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 3:08 am
Carpenter’s attorneys argue modern cellphone records are fundamentally different than phones used in 1979 and that a more recent Court decision from 2012, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:12 am
In Barrett Business Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:15 pm
United States, No. 06-87L (Apr. 15, 2008), where the landowner sought compensation after the Fish and Wildlife Service designated property as critical habitat for the Mississippi Sandhill Crane. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
Flickr user: drpavloff The US Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments on Tuesday morning in two companion cases revolving around whether police officers need a warrant to search a suspect's cell phone upon arrest: United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
A recent United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit case discusses what a passenger should or should not expect to be warned about by the cruise line. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Professor Karlan has also participated in extensive pro bono litigation, primarily before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 3:40 pm
As a result, Las Americas must revamp its representation strategy and divert resources to preparing individuals who have a genuine fear to manifest such a fear before entering the United States, significantly limiting the number of clients it can serve. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
United States v Arnold Decision (2006) In the NY Times story "Searching a computer", said Jennifer M. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
None of that, though, was obscene under Virginia's statutory definition nor under the United States Supreme Court's obscenity definition in Miller v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2006, 7:31 am
As far as this past week, there appears to be numerous losses from the larger including multiple losses from the California Supreme Court.The Third Circuit earlier in the week in Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:30 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Greece Comparative advertising ignites passion in mobile telephony (Class 46) Italy IFPI upset as Italian minister admits he’s a file-sharer (TorrentFreak) Netherlands BREIN cites Newzbin defeat, shuts Dutch Usenet links site (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom ACS:Law anti-piracy hunt takes toll on legal profession (TorrentFreak) Bad publicity forces lawyers out of anti-file sharing cases (TorrentFreak) United… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:21 am
That case is United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
'Flores-Figueroa' Requires Vacatur of Alien's §1028A Aggravated Identity Theft Conviction
United States v. [read post]
Guest Post: In Rush to Invalidate Patents at Pleadings Stage, Are Courts Coloring Outside the Lines?
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm
United States, 683 F.3d 1102, 1108 (9th Cir. 2012); In re American Cont’l Corp. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court Asked to Hear Proposition 8 Case Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: We are ready to defend our victories before the Supreme Court Washington, DC – Today, the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 asked the United States Supreme Court to review the landmark federal appeals court ruling in Perry v. [read post]
