Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 8821 - 8840 of 16,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Mukasey, No. 06-2477 "In order to establish eligibility for relief based exclusively on activities undertaken after his arrival in the United States, an alien must make some showing that authorities in his country of nationality are: 1) aware of his activities; or 2) likely to become aware of his activities. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
In a recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, In re Federal Mogul Global, Inc., No. 01-10578 (JKF) (Bankr. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Effective immediately upon the entry of this Consent Order, uPI will not import into the United States, sell for importation into the United States, or sell or offer for sale in the United States after importation, or knowingly aid, abet, encourage, participate in, or induce importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale, offer for sale, or use in the… [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:27 am
Code §1983 and the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution . . . by using a global positioning system (GPS) device to track [his] whereabouts without probable cause or a search warrant. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am by Jonathan H. Adler
On the merits, Chief Judge Sutton explained why the district court's decision represented an unwarranted expansion of the 14th Amendment's limitations on state lawmaking. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am by Sean Cornely
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
”  Judge Stark rebuked the attorney here — stating that Pure Hemp should have requested an evidentiary hearing rather than simply appealing. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:25 am
  The United States argues that the defendant was the true addressee; hence, why isn't that binding on the government, as an admission that the defendant does have standing? [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:16 am by SHG
Not if you’re a circuit judge, because getting beyond qualified immunity requires a litigant to jump a very high hurdle. [read post]