Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 8841 - 8860 of 11,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Moore’s concurring opinion is interesting. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Richard L. Hasen
Few corporations want to spend money directly in their own name on election ads. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by David Lat
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:17 pm
" In his concurrence, Chief Justice Hassell, while joining the court's opinion, wrote, "However, I write separately to state that I have serious concerns about the Court of Appeals' opinion in the former appeal, Miller-Jenkins v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
”He noted that a specific area to be watchful of is when law firm partners want to serve on boards of directors which creates potential for conflict of interest and liability threats, referring to Allen v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 3:40 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Jensen is unaware of CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Moore’s concurring opinion is interesting. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:37 am
" I found this particularly interesting because twice within the just the last few weeks I have had a discussion with new clients that went something like this: Client: I understand your firm can help me set up my China Joint Venture. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
  The decision has been cited by very few cases in the health law context, and usually it is for a delay of diagnosis. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 In a few situations, a discovery ruling may meet the requirements of a statute providing a right to direct appeal. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
  Is there some way to balance the state’s interest in greater diversity against the costs of explicit race consciousness? [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]