Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 21,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 11:42 am
A plaintiff appealed a trial court’s order granting summary disposition to a defendant fruit market after the plaintiff tripped over a landscaping tool in the defendant’s store. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:42 am
A plaintiff appealed a trial court’s order granting summary disposition to a defendant fruit market after the plaintiff tripped over a landscaping tool in the defendant’s store. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 11:38 am
Craigslist, the court concludes the Section 230 discussion by saying “Allegations premised on an ICS’s failure to “block, screen, or otherwise prevent the dissemination of a third party’s content,” seek to hold the defendant liable in its capacity as a “publisher. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am
The defendant also bonded with the tipper’s son. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act holds “control persons” liable for violation of Section 10(b). [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 11:53 am
Therefore, as the defendants didn’t intend for the third party to show the advertisement or even be aware the advertisement was being shown, they couldn’t be held liable. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
The defendant wants to make sure they are going to have their legal expenses covered and not be personally liable for any damages awarded at trial, while plaintiff wants to make sure they have the best shot at actually recovering damages if they win. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 10:06 am
The other theory was that so long as the initial complaint gave defendant fair notice of the general factual scenario that underpinned the claim, amendments stating new legal theories could relate back (Florida’s 2nd and 5th District Court of Appeal). [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 6:35 am
This means that even if a judge or jury finds a driver “not guilty” of criminal charges, a jury may still find the same defendant liable in a civil action. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 6:35 am
This means that even if a judge or jury finds a driver “not guilty” of criminal charges, a jury may still find the same defendant liable in a civil action. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:16 pm
Employers can be liable under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) if they “fail to take all reasonable steps necessary to prevent discrimination and harassment from occurring. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:37 pm
These are as follows:T-117-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:37 pm
These are as follows:T-117-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm
Rather than assert primary liability for these alleged misstatements, the plaintiffs argued that the corporate defendants were liable as participants in a scheme to mislead investors. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, however, was “enormously fact-laden, … implicating no splits, and raising no important question of law,” Gorsuch said. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The defendants in this case are former CIA contractors James Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen, whose role in designing the now-infamous enhanced interrogation program used in black site CIA prisons overseas was detailed in the declassified Executive Summary of the CIA’s Detention and Interrogation Program (SSCI Report). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
The public interest, including preserving funds for consumer redress, outweighed the private interests cited at stake, unless defendants offered a workable method to separate and preserve a legitimate line of business.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:50 am
The patient had suffered a stroke and was mostly paralyzed, making it difficult for her to defend herself. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:50 am
The patient had suffered a stroke and was mostly paralyzed, making it difficult for her to defend herself. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:06 pm
The fact that the property owner chose to do so as part of the contract did not mean it assumed the position of statutory employer, at least that’s what the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled when it decided plaintiff could proceed with his personal injury lawsuit against defendant, even though defendant/ defendant’s insurer had paid workers’ compensation benefits. [read post]
