Search for: "People v. House"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 12,876
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
In a hearing on mandatory binding arbitration agreements before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Judiciary Committee, a Congressman from Utah named Chris Cannon listened to a consumer victim describe buying her dream home for hundreds of thousands of dollars, only to discover it was a "lemon home" that had been badly built. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
House Judiciary Committee last year. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
The cases decided to date are People (DPP) v Cunningham [2012] IECCA 64, People (DPP) v Kavanagh [2012] IECCA 65, and People (DPP) v Barry O’Brien [2012] IECCA 68, and in each case the Court of Criminal Appeal has overturned the original conviction and ordered retrials. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
When I was with you two years ago, I quoted President Franklin Roosevelt when he signed the first of the foundational securities laws in 1933: “This law and its effective administration are steps in a program to restore some old-fashioned standards of rectitude. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Eugene V. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
The second reading of the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill in the House of Commons did not take place as scheduled on 5 September 2022 in order to “allow Ministers to consider the legislation further”. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
The House Judiciary Committee has reported favorably on the bill and recommended its passage. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Jones are not the real names but they are real people and their legal problems were all too real. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:55 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm
* MagicJack LP v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
It states: “Article 7. (1) All powers in the Republic belong to the people, and their exercise on behalf of the people shall be effected only under, and by the authority of, this Constitution(2) This Constitution is, as the solemn expression of the will of the people, the supreme law of the Republic, and if any other law is inconsistent with this Constitution that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
The House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127 explained why English law should adopt a different approach. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:59 pm
Fancaster, Inc. v. [read post]
