Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 55,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 7:33 am
It is not a housing case at all, but the opening paragraphs of Sir Alan Ward’s Court of Appeal judgment in Wright v Michael Wright Supplies Ltd & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 234 are a remarkable and powerful statement of the position that the Court finds itself in with the removal of much legal aid, and the MoJ’s emphasis on mediation as a cure all for the un-represented. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm
In a rather scathing decision in Hurst v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:33 am
It is not a housing case at all, but the opening paragraphs of Sir Alan Ward’s Court of Appeal judgment in Wright v Michael Wright Supplies Ltd & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 234 are a remarkable and powerful statement of the position that the Court finds itself in with the removal of much legal aid, and the MoJ’s emphasis on mediation as a cure all for the un-represented. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
If there are dozens of regulated entities, could they all have market power??? [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
Depositions are powerful. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:37 am
Per Ghanem v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
A public judgment was given at the time in anonymised form (MNB v News Group Newspapers [2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This owes, in large part, to the High Court of Australia’s unanimous decision[1]in Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
See, e.g., Welch v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:28 pm
The Seventh Circuit explains in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:29 am
So, in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm
The decision by Western powers to fight the war in Ukraine through swingeing sanctions regimes is widely regarded as a hugely powerful demonstration of the West’s unified commitment to the championing of liberal democratic values, in the face of an amoral totalitarian aggressor. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:43 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. today in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:20 am
In Bader v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Once upon a time, jurors had the power to nullify the law. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (06-1505). [read post]
