Search for: "R. B." Results 8841 - 8860 of 55,718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2018, 9:59 am by Jan von Hein
Shchavelev: The new DIS Arbitration Rules 2018 On 1/3/2018, the new arbitration rules of the German Arbitration Institute (Deutsche Institution für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit e.V. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:06 pm by Olivier Moréteau
                 HOW TO SUBMIT A PROPOSALAbstracts should be submitted by e-mail at aidc.parma2019@gmail.com in Word format, following this order:a) author(s) b) affiliation c) e-mail address d) title of abstract e) body of abstract (apx 250 words) Abstract file should be entitled: Family Name_Last Name.docVI. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:52 am by Genevieve Perez
Under the Act, when social media platforms display a political ad on their platform, they must either display (a) the text “paid for by” or “ad paid for by” followed by the disclosure name provided by the committee purchasing the ad, or (b) a hyperlink, icon, button or tab with the text “who paid for this ad? [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:52 am by Genevieve Perez
Under the Act, when social media platforms display a political ad on their platform, they must either display (a) the text “paid for by” or “ad paid for by” followed by the disclosure name provided by the committee purchasing the ad, or (b) a hyperlink, icon, button or tab with the text “who paid for this ad? [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:52 am by Genevieve Perez
Under the Act, when social media platforms display a political ad on their platform, they must either display (a) the text “paid for by” or “ad paid for by” followed by the disclosure name provided by the committee purchasing the ad, or (b) a hyperlink, icon, button or tab with the text “who paid for this ad? [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 8:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Additionally, the appeals court had to address whether Section NLRA 14(b)’s exception to preemption for state “right-to-work” laws allowed Wisconsin to do what it attempted to do here. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
Clause 4 (b) of the same Article[2], provides that a person who is arrested or detained upon reasonable suspicion of having committed or being about to commit a criminal offence under the laws of Uganda, shall if not earlier released be brought to court as soon as possible but in any case not later than forty-eight hours from the time of arrest. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:39 am by Tom Dougherty
As for those cable systems that offer information services but not traditional telecom services, the NPRM would tentatively conclude that Section 624(b) of the Cable Act bars LFA regulation of their non-cable services, as it bars LFAs from establishing “requirements for … information services. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 11:16 am
The latest issue of the Human Rights Law Review (Vol. 18, no. 3, September 2018) is out. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC v Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris  Ledva & Meyers, LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 32019(U)  August 17, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number:  153477/2016   Judge: Carol R. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:34 am by Joel R. Brandes
          The district court observed that Section 8(b)(3) of ICARA states that: Any court ordering the return of a child pursuant to an action brought under section 9003 of this title shall order the respondent to pay necessary expenses incurred by or on behalf of the petitioner, including court costs, legal fees, foster home or other care during the course of proceedings in the action, and transportation costs related to the return of the… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:25 am by Joel R. Brandes
These affirmative defenses included: (1) that R.C. had been here for at least a year and was well settled in her home and school in New Jersey, where she was excelling socially and academically; (2) that R.C. was of sufficient maturity and has articulated her desire to stay in the United States and did not want to return to Ecuador; (3) that Petitioner was not exercising his custody rights because he did not visit or care for R.C. as articulated in the custody agreement; and (4) that R.C. would be… [read post]