Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 8841 - 8860 of 10,137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2010, 5:51 am by Nancy Prager
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:09 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
Likewise, a mere tip from United States agents to foreign authorities is not enough.The following factors are important in this analysis:(1) whether the United States agents instigated or helped plan the search;(2) the degree of cooperation between foreign officials and United States agents in the investigation;(3) the degree of participation by United States agents in the search;(4) evidence that United States… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Work may be considered as ongoing during a short lapse of time necessary to conduct tests designed to assure proper performance where such testing is an essential element of the work by the insured (see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:59 pm by Lisa McElroy
Take Monday's short-as-can-be decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:53 am by Jeffrey Kahn
Shipley wrote you a letter that said your travel is "not in the interests of the United States," you stayed put. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:13 am by David Navetta
People’s United Bank (“PATCO”) and JM Test Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  Here’s the 9th District’s recitation of the facts in State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
The closures are distributed across eight different states. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm by Ilya Somin
" Yet even Stevens stops short of stating that this by itself proves that corporations don't have free speech rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:57 am by Adam Steinman
Read correctly, the framework established by Twombly and Iqbal is not inconsistent with (to quote S. 1504) "the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
Shareholders in the United States continue to have much weaker shareholder rights than shareholders in the UK and other English-speaking countries. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am by Howard Wasserman
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]