Search for: "State v. Light" Results 8841 - 8860 of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2024, 10:23 am by Arkady Itkin
The Malloy v Superior Court (2022) case, which involved pregnancy discrimination allegations recognized the need to interpret the FEHA venue provision liberally in order to afford the aggrieved employees the greatest protection in filing a lawsuit and also in light of the remote work becoming ever so more common in the post-pandemic world. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:03 am by Keith Lee
FYI – The Supreme Court of the United States begins its new term today. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
Mississippi, 17-7245 Issue: Whether the death penalty in and of itself violates the Eighth Amendment in light of contemporary standards of decency and the geographic arbitrariness of its imposition. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 2:35 pm
The Abstract: This Article explores a conflict between the protections afforded interpersonal relations in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 2:50 am by Patricia Salkin
The New York State Court of Appeals issued a decision on historic preservation regulations last month in Matter of Save America’s Clocks, Inc. v City of New York, 2019 WL 1385906 (N.Y. 3/28/2019). [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm by Orin Kerr
The latest contribution to the Second Circuit’s reversal docket is a 400-page sentencing opinion from earlier this week, United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
  The author of Section 23123 expressly stated that it applied only to "holding a cell phone up to [one's] ear." [read post]
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]